Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Roccat Kone Pure Optical vs Cooler Master CM310 Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Roccat Cooler Master
Model Kone Pure Optical CM310
Photo
Release Date 2013 2018
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ ADV Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~120 mm
~12 cm
~4.72 in
~127 mm
~12.7 cm
~5 in
Width ~70 mm
~7 cm
~2.76 in
~71.5 mm
~7.15 cm
~2.81 in
Height ~35 mm
~3.5 cm
~1.38 in
~39.5 mm
~3.95 cm
~1.56 in
Weight ~90 g
~0.09 kg
~0.2 lbs
~100 g
~0.1 kg
~0.22 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model Avago A3090 PMW3325
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 400 - 4000 100 - 10000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 4000 10000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 400 100
Maximum Acceleration 20 G 20 G
Max Tracking Speed 60 IPS 60 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 1000 Hz (1ms)
Lift Off Distance ~1.5 mm High, 3.0 mm
Switch Type Omron Unknown
Switch Lifespan 20 million clicks -
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes No
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 10.5 ms 23.8 ms
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Right-handed Ambidextrous
Buttons 7 8
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip, Claw grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black
Battery Time -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ ADV Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model Kone Pure Optical CM310
Picture
Age 11 Years 6 Years
Relative Age 5 Years Older 5 Years Younger
User Rating 3% Worse Score 3% Better Score
Dimensions ~7.00 mm (or ~0.28 in) Shorter
~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Narrower
~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Lower
~7.00 mm (or ~0.28 in) Longer
~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Wider
~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Higher
Weight ~10.00 g or ~0.02 lbs Lighter ~10.00 g or ~0.02 lbs Heavier
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Way Smaller Range Way Larger Range
Max Resolution 60% Worse Max Res.
6000 Less DPI/CPI
60% Better Max Res.
6000 More DPI/CPI
Min Resolution 75% Worse Min Res
300 Less DPI/CPI
75% Better Min Res
300 More DPI/CPI
Maximum Acceleration Same Max G Same Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed Same Max IPS Same Max IPS
Polling Rate Same Polling Rate Same Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Smaller Lift Off Distance Greater Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Different Switch Tech Different Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons 1 Less Buttons 1 More Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency 56% Better Click Latency 56% Worse Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Roccat Kone Pure Optical Cooler Master CM310
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ ADV Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Roccat Kone Pure Optical and Cooler Master CM310, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The Kone Pure Optical is older, 11 years old, being released in the 2013, while the other one is younger, 6 years old, being released in the 2018. The production age difference is 5 year(s). This makes the CM310 kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to CM310 mouse, Kone Pure Optical is ~7.00 mm (or ~0.28 in) Shorter, ~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Narrower and ~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 13 mm (or -0.51 in) moderately smaller and better suiting tinier hands.

Considering the weight, Roccat Kone Pure Optical is 10% lighter, a difference of 10.00 g (0.02 lbs), which can be considered not so significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, Kone Pure Optical is meant to be Right-handed while CM310 is Ambidextrous. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by Kone Pure Optical while CM310 has Palm grip, Claw grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 3 instead of the 2 offered by the other one.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Roccat Kone Pure Optical sensor with the one of Cooler Master CM310. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Avago A3090 equipped by Kone Pure Optical and PMW3325 used by CM310. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Kone Pure Optical provides 3600 DPI/CPI, while CM310 offers 9900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has way larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, CM310 is offering 60% better Max Resolution, 6000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, they have the same spec of 60 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of CM310 shows an higher value, 3 mm, a great difference of 1.50 mm. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

Roccat Kone Pure Optical has lower click latency than Cooler Master CM310, a great difference of 13.30 ms, 56% better Click Latency, which can be evaluated very significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Kone Pure Optical and CM310 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Kone Pure Optical has Omron while CM310 has Unknown; The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 7 offered by first mouse and 8 offered by the second one, a small difference of 1 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Roccat Kone Pure Optical are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Cooler Master CM310 is giving DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ ADV Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Kone Pure Optical and CM310 models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Kone Pure Optical and CM310 performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Roccat Kone Pure Optical Cooler Master CM310
2363924361
49%51%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Roccat Kone Pure Optical and Cooler Master CM310 specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Roccat Kone Pure Optical Vs Cooler Master CM310 comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!