The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Gigabyte Aorus M2 and Ozone Neon M50, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 5 years old, being released in the 2019, while Neon M50 is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017. The production age difference is 2 year(s). This makes the Aorus M2 a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Neon M50 mouse, Aorus M2 is ~15.60 mm (or ~0.61 in) Shorter, ~10.50 mm (or ~0.41 in) Narrower and ~5.30 mm (or ~0.21 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 31.4 mm (or -1.24 in) way smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Gigabyte Aorus M2 is 34% lighter, a difference of 39.00 g (0.09 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice can be used with right or left hand. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Gigabyte Aorus M2 sensor with the one of Ozone Neon M50. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3327 equipped by Aorus M2 and PMW3310 used by Neon M50. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Aorus M2 provides 6000 DPI/CPI, while Neon M50 offers 4200 DPI/CPI, meaning that the first one has larger range. Consider picking up the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Aorus M2 is offering 19% better Max Resolution, 1200 More DPI/CPI.
As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 30 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Aorus M2 shows a preferable value, 220 IPS, a moderate difference of 90 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
Aorus M2 has a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms, while Neon M50 is characterized by 100 Hz or an input every 10.00 ms, making this last one having 90% worse Polling Rate. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of Aorus M2 shows an higher value, 2.5 mm, a great difference of 1.30 mm. Anyway, Neon M50 offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of Neon M50 is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, Aorus M2 has a click latency of 7.5 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Aorus M2 and Neon M50 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with the same Switch Technology, Omron; The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 8 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a small difference of 2 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Gigabyte Aorus M2 are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Ozone Neon M50 is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Aorus M2 and Neon M50 models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Aorus M2 and Neon M50 performance in different utilization environments.
Comparison Score
Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.
➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer. ➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them. ➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years. ➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices. ➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer:The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!
