Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Redragon M719 Invader vs Logitech G203 Prodigy Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Redragon Logitech
Model M719 Invader G203 Prodigy
Photo
Release Date 2018 2017
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~117 mm
~11.7 cm
~4.61 in
~116.6 mm
~11.66 cm
~4.59 in
Width ~63.5 mm
~6.35 cm
~2.5 in
~62.15 mm
~6.22 cm
~2.45 in
Height ~39 mm
~3.9 cm
~1.54 in
~38.2 mm
~3.82 cm
~1.5 in
Weight ~93 g
~0.09 kg
~0.21 lbs
~85 g
~0.09 kg
~0.19 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model PMW3325 Mercury
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 - 5000 200 - 8000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 5000 8000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 200
Maximum Acceleration 20 G 25 G
Max Tracking Speed 100 IPS 200 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 1000 Hz (1ms)
Lift Off Distance ~3.0 mm ~1.0 mm
Switch Type Omron Unknown
Switch Lifespan 10 million clicks -
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE (250 kilometers)
Onboard Memory Yes Yes
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 8 ms 5 ms
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Ambidextrous
Buttons 8 6
Suggested Grip Claw grip, Fingertip grip Fingertip grip, Claw grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model M719 Invader G203 Prodigy
Picture
Age 6 Years 7 Years
Relative Age 1 Year Younger 1 Year Older
User Rating 5% Better Score 5% Worse Score
Dimensions ~0.40 mm (or ~0.02 in) Longer
~1.35 mm (or ~0.05 in) Wider
~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Higher
~0.40 mm (or ~0.02 in) Shorter
~1.35 mm (or ~0.05 in) Narrower
~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Lower
Weight ~8.00 g or ~0.02 lbs Heavier ~8.00 g or ~0.02 lbs Lighter
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Smaller Range Larger Range
Max Resolution 38% Worse Max Res.
3000 Less DPI/CPI
38% Better Max Res.
3000 More DPI/CPI
Min Resolution 50% Better Min Res.
100 More DPI/CPI
50% Worse Min Res.
100 Less DPI/CPI
Maximum Acceleration 20% Worse Max G 20% Better Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 50% Worse Max IPS 50% Better Max IPS
Polling Rate Same Polling Rate Same Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Greater Lift Off Distance Smaller Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Different Switch Tech Different Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan
Feet Material Type Different Feet Material Different Feet Material
Number of Buttons 2 More Buttons 2 Less Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency 38% Worse Click Latency 38% Better Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Redragon M719 Invader Logitech G203 Prodigy
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Redragon M719 Invader and Logitech G203 Prodigy, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 6 years old, being released in the 2018, while G203 Prodigy is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017. The production age difference is 1 year(s). This makes the M719 Invader a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to G203 Prodigy mouse, M719 Invader is ~0.40 mm (or ~0.02 in) Longer, ~1.35 mm (or ~0.05 in) Wider and ~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 2.55 mm (or 0.10 in) different in size and not significantly influencing the choice based on own's hand size.

Considering the weight, Redragon M719 Invader is 9% heavier, a difference of 8.00 g (0.02 lbs), which can be considered not so significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice can be used with right or left hand. They offer different grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by M719 Invader while G203 Prodigy has Fingertip grip, Claw grip; however, the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 2.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Redragon M719 Invader sensor with the one of Logitech G203 Prodigy. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3325 equipped by M719 Invader and Mercury used by G203 Prodigy. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the M719 Invader provides 4900 DPI/CPI, while G203 Prodigy offers 7800 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, G203 Prodigy is offering 38% better Max Resolution, 3000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, G203 Prodigy shows a better value, 25 G, a small difference of 5 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, G203 Prodigy shows a preferable value, 200 IPS, a moderate difference of 100 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of M719 Invader shows an higher value, 3 mm, a great difference of 2.00 mm. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

Redragon M719 Invader has higher click latency than Logitech G203 Prodigy, a not so small difference of 3.00 ms, 38% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated slightly significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare M719 Invader and G203 Prodigy shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, M719 Invader has Omron while G203 Prodigy has Unknown; The Feet Material is different, M719 Invader (PTFE) and G203 Prodigy (PTFE (250 kilometers)). Considering the available Number of Buttons, 8 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a small difference of 2 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Redragon M719 Invader are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Logitech G203 Prodigy is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the M719 Invader and G203 Prodigy models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the M719 Invader and G203 Prodigy performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Redragon M719 Invader Logitech G203 Prodigy
2178526215
45%55%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Redragon M719 Invader and Logitech G203 Prodigy specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Redragon M719 Invader Vs Logitech G203 Prodigy comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!