The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Tecware Exo + and Ozone Neon M10, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 4 years old, being released in the 2020, while Neon M10 is older, 8 years old, being released in the 2016. The production age difference is 4 year(s). This makes the Exo + kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Neon M10 mouse, Exo + is ~3.50 mm (or ~0.14 in) Longer, ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Wider and ~1.20 mm (or ~0.05 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 6.7 mm (or 0.26 in) slightly bigger and better suiting greater hands.
Considering the weight, Tecware Exo + is 23% lighter, a difference of 21.00 g (0.05 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice can be used with right or left hand. They offer the same grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 2.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Tecware Exo + sensor with the one of Ozone Neon M10. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3327 equipped by Exo + and Avago A3050 used by Neon M10. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Exo + provides 6100 DPI/CPI, while Neon M10 offers 1200 DPI/CPI, meaning that the first one has way larger range. Consider picking up the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Exo + is offering 68% better Max Resolution, 4200 More DPI/CPI.
As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Exo + shows a better value, 30 G, a small difference of 10 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Exo + shows a preferable value, 220 IPS, a significant difference of 160 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of Exo + shows an higher value, 2.5 mm, a moderate difference of 0.50 mm. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
At the moment there is no available data to compare Exo + and Neon M10 click latency. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Exo + and Neon M10 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Exo + has Huano while Neon M10 has Omron; The Feet Material is different, Exo + (PTFE) and Neon M10 (Plastic). Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a no difference of 0 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Tecware Exo + are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Ozone Neon M10 is giving DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting.
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Exo + and Neon M10 models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Exo + and Neon M10 performance in different utilization environments.
Comparison Score
Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.
➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer. ➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them. ➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years. ➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices. ➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer:The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!
