Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
Manufacturer | Sharkoon | Roccat |
Model | Light² S | Kone Air |
Photo | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Your Rating | ||
Price (#Ad) |

Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
Length | ~126 mm ~12.6 cm ~4.96 in |
~132 mm ~13.2 cm ~5.2 in |
Width | ~66 mm ~6.6 cm ~2.6 in |
~82 mm ~8.2 cm ~3.23 in |
Height | ~40 mm ~4 cm ~1.57 in |
~43 mm ~4.3 cm ~1.69 in |
Weight | ~78 g ~0.08 kg ~0.17 lbs |
~119 g ~0.12 kg ~0.26 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Sensor Model | PMW3327 | Owl-Eye 19K (PMW3370) |
Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 200 - 6200 | 50 - 19000 |
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 6200 | 19000 |
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 200 | 50 |
Maximum Acceleration | 30 G | 50 G |
Max Tracking Speed | 220 IPS | 400 IPS |
Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1 ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
Lift Off Distance | ~3.0 mm | Adjustable (~1.0 mm default) |
Switch Type | Unknown | Titan Optical |
Switch Lifespan | 10 million clicks | 100 million clicks |
Feet (Material) | PTFE | Virgin Grade PTFE |
Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
Click Latency | 10.9 ms | 3.7 ms |
Shift Latency | - | 2 ms |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming, Business Mouse |
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Ergonomy | Ambidextrous | Right-handed |
Buttons | ||
Suggested Grip | Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip | Palm grip, Claw grip |
DPI Indicator | Yes | Yes |
Lighting | Yes | No |
Adjustable Lighting | Yes | No |
Adjustable Weight | No | No |
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | No |
Silent Clicking | No | No |
Colors | Black | Black, White |
Battery Time | - | AA |
Battery Type | - | 800 h |

Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
Warranty | 2 Years | 2 years |
Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
Model | Light² S | Kone Air |
Picture | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Age | 4 Years | 2 Years |
Relative Age | 2 Years Older | 2 Years Younger |
User Rating ☆ | 16% Better Score | 16% Worse Score |
Dimensions | ~6.00 mm (or ~0.24 in) Shorter ~16.00 mm (or ~0.63 in) Narrower ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Lower |
~6.00 mm (or ~0.24 in) Longer ~16.00 mm (or ~0.63 in) Wider ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Higher |
Weight | ~41.00 g or ~0.09 lbs Lighter | ~41.00 g or ~0.09 lbs Heavier |
Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Way Smaller Range | Way Larger Range |
Max Resolution | 67% Worse Max Res. 12800 Less DPI/CPI |
67% Better Max Res. 12800 More DPI/CPI |
Min Resolution | 75% Worse Min Res 150 Less DPI/CPI |
75% Better Min Res 150 More DPI/CPI |
Maximum Acceleration | 40% Worse Max G | 40% Better Max G |
Maximum Tracking Speed | 45% Worse Max IPS | 45% Better Max IPS |
Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate |
Lift Off Distance | Greater Lift Off Distance | Smaller Lift Off Distance |
Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
Switch Lifespan | 90% Worse Lifespan | 90% Better Lifespan |
Feet Material Type | Worse Feet Material | Better Feet Material |
Number of Buttons | 1 Less Buttons | 1 More Buttons |
Battery Time | ||
Click Latency | 66% Worse Click Latency | 66% Better Click Latency |
Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
Compare Price #Ad |
Sharkoon Light² S | Roccat Kone Air |

Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Sharkoon Light² S and Roccat Kone Air, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, mice have different utilization aim, Light² S is meant to be Gaming mouse while Kone Air, instead, Gaming, Business Mouse. The Light² S is older, 4 years old, being released in the 2020, while the other one is younger, 2 years old, being released in the 2022. The production age difference is 2 year(s). This makes the Kone Air a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Kone Air mouse, Light² S is ~6.00 mm (or ~0.24 in) Shorter, ~16.00 mm (or ~0.63 in) Narrower and ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 25 mm (or -0.98 in) significantly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Sharkoon Light² S is 34% lighter, a difference of 41.00 g (0.09 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, Light² S is meant to be Ambidextrous while Kone Air is Right-handed. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by Light² S while Kone Air has Palm grip, Claw grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 3 instead of the 2 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Sharkoon Light² S sensor with the one of Roccat Kone Air. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3327 equipped by Light² S and Owl-Eye 19K (PMW3370) used by Kone Air. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Light² S provides 6000 DPI/CPI, while Kone Air offers 18950 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has way larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Kone Air is offering 67% better Max Resolution, 12800 More DPI/CPI.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Kone Air shows a better value, 50 G, a moderate difference of 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Kone Air shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a significant difference of 180 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of Light² S shows an higher value, 3 mm, a great difference of 2.00 mm. Anyway, Kone Air offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Sharkoon Light² S has higher click latency than Roccat Kone Air, a great difference of 7.20 ms, 66% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated very significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Light² S is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, Kone Air has a shift latency of 2 ms which can be considered very good , compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Light² S has Unknown while Kone Air has Titan Optical; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 10 millions clicks while the second is 1000 millions clicks, 90% worse Lifespan, a difference of 90 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is better for Kone Air, being this Virgin Grade PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 8 offered by first mouse and 9 offered by the second one, a small difference of 1 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Sharkoon Light² S are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Roccat Kone Air is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator.

Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Light² S and Kone Air models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Light² S and Kone Air performance in different utilization environments.
Sharkoon Light² S | Roccat Kone Air |
19454 | 28546 |
41% | 59% |
Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Sharkoon Light² S Vs Roccat Kone Air comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!