Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
| Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
| Manufacturer | Logitech | Roccat |
| Model | G Pro X Superlight | Kone Pure Owl-Eye |
| Photo |  |
 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
| Your Rating | ||
| Price (#Ad) |
Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
| Length | ~125 mm ~12.5 cm ~4.92 in |
~115 mm ~11.5 cm ~4.53 in |
| Width | ~63.5 mm ~6.35 cm ~2.5 in |
~70 mm ~7 cm ~2.76 in |
| Height | ~40 mm ~4 cm ~1.57 in |
~39 mm ~3.9 cm ~1.54 in |
| Weight | ~63 g ~0.06 kg ~0.14 lbs |
~88 g ~0.09 kg ~0.19 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Sensor Model | Hero 25K | Owl Eye (~PMW3361) |
| Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 - 25600 | 100 - 12000 |
| Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 25600 | 12000 |
| Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum Acceleration | 40 G | 50 G |
| Max Tracking Speed | 400 IPS | 250 IPS |
| Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1 ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
| Lift Off Distance | ~1.2 mm | Adjustable (~1.2 mm with HQ cloths) |
| Switch Type | Omron d2fc-f-7n(G1) | Omron |
| Switch Lifespan | 20 million clicks | 50 million clicks |
| Feet (Material) | PTFE | PTFE |
| Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
| Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
| Click Latency | 3 ms | 10.4 ms |
| Shift Latency | 7.21 ms | - |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
| Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming mouse |
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Ergonomy | Ambidextrous | Right-handed |
| Buttons | ||
| Suggested Grip | Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip | Claw grip, Fingertip grip |
| DPI Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Lighting | No | Yes |
| Adjustable Lighting | No | Yes |
| Adjustable Weight | No | No |
| Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | No |
| Silent Clicking | No | No |
| Colors | Black, White | Black |
| Battery Time | 70 h | - |
| Battery Type | Unknown | - |
Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
| Warranty | 2 Years | 2 Years |
| Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
| Model | G Pro X Superlight | Kone Pure Owl-Eye |
| Picture | |
|
| Age | 4 Years | 7 Years |
| Relative Age | 3 Years Younger | 3 Years Older |
| User Rating ☆ | 2% Worse Score | 2% Better Score |
| Dimensions | ~10.00 mm (or ~0.39 in) Longer ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Narrower ~1.00 mm (or ~0.04 in) Higher |
~10.00 mm (or ~0.39 in) Shorter ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Wider ~1.00 mm (or ~0.04 in) Lower |
| Weight | ~25.00 g or ~0.06 lbs Lighter | ~25.00 g or ~0.06 lbs Heavier |
| Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
| Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Way Larger Range | Way Smaller Range |
| Max Resolution | 53% Better Max Res 13600 More DPI/CPI |
53% Worse Max Res 13600 Less DPI/CPI |
| Min Resolution | Same Min Res. | Same Min Res. |
| Maximum Acceleration | 20% Worse Max G | 20% Better Max G |
| Maximum Tracking Speed | 38% Better Max IPS | 38% Worse Max IPS |
| Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate |
| Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance |
| Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
| Switch Lifespan | 60% Worse Lifespan | 60% Better Lifespan |
| Feet Material Type | Same Feet Material | Same Feet Material |
| Number of Buttons | 2 Less Buttons | 2 More Buttons |
| Battery Time | ||
| Click Latency | 71% Better Click Latency | 71% Worse Click Latency |
| Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
| Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
| Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
| Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
| Compare Price #Ad |
Logitech G Pro X Superlight | Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye |
Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Logitech G Pro X Superlight and Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 4 years old, being released in the 2020, while Kone Pure Owl-Eye is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017. The production age difference is 3 year(s). This makes the G Pro X Superlight kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Kone Pure Owl-Eye mouse, G Pro X Superlight is ~10.00 mm (or ~0.39 in) Longer, ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Narrower and ~1.00 mm (or ~0.04 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 4.5 mm (or 0.18 in) different in size and not significantly influencing the choice based on own's hand size.
Considering the weight, Logitech G Pro X Superlight is 28% lighter, a difference of 25.00 g (0.06 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, G Pro X Superlight is meant to be Ambidextrous while Kone Pure Owl-Eye is Right-handed. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by G Pro X Superlight while Kone Pure Owl-Eye has Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 3 instead of the 2 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Logitech G Pro X Superlight sensor with the one of Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Hero 25K equipped by G Pro X Superlight and Owl Eye (~PMW3361) used by Kone Pure Owl-Eye. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the G Pro X Superlight provides 25500 DPI/CPI, while Kone Pure Owl-Eye offers 11900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the first one has way larger range. Consider picking up the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, G Pro X Superlight is offering 53% better Max Resolution, 13600 More DPI/CPI.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Kone Pure Owl-Eye shows a better value, 50 G, a small difference of 10 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, G Pro X Superlight shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a significant difference of 150 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, G Pro X Superlight and Kone Pure Owl-Eye share a Lift Off distance of 1.2 mm, above this one they will not work accurately. Anyway, Kone Pure Owl-Eye offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Logitech G Pro X Superlight has lower click latency than Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye, a great difference of 7.40 ms, 71% better Click Latency, which can be evaluated very significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Kone Pure Owl-Eye is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, G Pro X Superlight has a shift latency of 7.21 ms which can be considered very good , compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, G Pro X Superlight has Omron d2fc-f-7n(G1) while Kone Pure Owl-Eye has Omron; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 20 millions clicks while the second is 500 millions clicks, 60% worse Lifespan, a difference of 30 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 5 offered by first mouse and 7 offered by the second one, a small difference of 2 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Logitech G Pro X Superlight are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, while Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the G Pro X Superlight and Kone Pure Owl-Eye models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the G Pro X Superlight and Kone Pure Owl-Eye performance in different utilization environments.
| Logitech G Pro X Superlight | Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye |
| 26564 | 21436 |
| 55% | 45% |
| Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
| Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
| Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Logitech G Pro X Superlight Vs Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!