Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 vs Thermaltake Tt e-Sports IRIS Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Mad Catz Thermaltake
Model R.A.T. PRO X3 Tt E-sports Iris
Photo
Release Date 2020 2018
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~115 mm
~11.5 cm
~4.53 in
~123 mm
~12.3 cm
~4.84 in
Width ~87 mm
~8.7 cm
~3.43 in
~68.7 mm
~6.87 cm
~2.7 in
Height ~38 mm
~3.8 cm
~1.5 in
~41 mm
~4.1 cm
~1.61 in
Weight ~105 g
~0.11 kg
~0.23 lbs
~123 g
~0.12 kg
~0.27 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model PMW3389 PMW3325
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 - 16000 400 - 5000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 16000 5000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 400
Maximum Acceleration 50 G 20 G
Max Tracking Speed 400 IPS 100 IPS
Polling Rate 3000 Hz (0.3 ms) 2000 Hz (0.5ms)
Lift Off Distance Adjustable (~2.0 mm default) ~2.0 mm
Switch Type Omron Omron
Switch Lifespan 50 million clicks 20 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes Yes
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 10.5 ms 6.5 ms
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Right-handed Right-hand
Buttons 10 6
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 1 Year 2 Years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model R.A.T. PRO X3 Tt E-sports Iris
Picture
Age 4 Years 6 Years
Relative Age 2 Years Younger 2 Years Older
User Rating 15% Worse Score 15% Better Score
Dimensions ~8.00 mm (or ~0.31 in) Shorter
~18.30 mm (or ~0.72 in) Wider
~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Lower
~8.00 mm (or ~0.31 in) Longer
~18.30 mm (or ~0.72 in) Narrower
~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Higher
Weight ~18.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Lighter ~18.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Heavier
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Way Larger Range Way Smaller Range
Max Resolution 69% Better Max Res
11000 More DPI/CPI
69% Worse Max Res
11000 Less DPI/CPI
Min Resolution 75% Better Min Res.
300 More DPI/CPI
75% Worse Min Res.
300 Less DPI/CPI
Maximum Acceleration 60% Better Max G 60% Worse Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 75% Better Max IPS 75% Worse Max IPS
Polling Rate 33% Better Polling Rate 33% Worse Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Same Lift Off Distance Same Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Same Switch Tech Same Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan 60% Better Lifespan 60% Worse Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons 4 More Buttons 4 Less Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency 38% Worse Click Latency 38% Better Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 and Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 4 years old, being released in the 2020, while Tt E-sports Iris is older, 6 years old, being released in the 2018. The production age difference is 2 year(s). This makes the R.A.T. PRO X3 a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Tt E-sports Iris mouse, R.A.T. PRO X3 is ~8.00 mm (or ~0.31 in) Shorter, ~18.30 mm (or ~0.72 in) Wider and ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 7.3 mm (or 0.29 in) slightly bigger and better suiting greater hands.

Considering the weight, Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 is 15% lighter, a difference of 18.00 g (0.04 lbs), which can be considered moderately significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, R.A.T. PRO X3 is meant to be Right-handed while Tt E-sports Iris is Right-hand. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 sensor with the one of Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3389 equipped by R.A.T. PRO X3 and PMW3325 used by Tt E-sports Iris. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the R.A.T. PRO X3 provides 15900 DPI/CPI, while Tt E-sports Iris offers 4600 DPI/CPI, meaning that the first one has way larger range. Consider picking up the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, R.A.T. PRO X3 is offering 69% better Max Resolution, 11000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, R.A.T. PRO X3 shows a better value, 50 G, a significant difference of 30 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, R.A.T. PRO X3 shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a great difference of 300 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

R.A.T. PRO X3 has a Polling Rate of 3000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 0.33 ms, while Tt E-sports Iris is characterized by 2000 Hz or an input every 0.50 ms, making this last one having 33% worse Polling Rate. Lastly, R.A.T. PRO X3 and Tt E-sports Iris share a Lift Off distance of 2 mm, above this one they will not work accurately. Anyway, R.A.T. PRO X3 offers adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 has higher click latency than Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris, a consistent difference of 4.00 ms, 38% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare R.A.T. PRO X3 and Tt E-sports Iris shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with the same Switch Technology, Omron; moreover, the Switch lifespan of first mouse is 50 millions clicks while the second is 20 millions clicks, 60% better Lifespan, a difference of 30 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 10 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a moderate difference of 4 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the R.A.T. PRO X3 and Tt E-sports Iris models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the R.A.T. PRO X3 and Tt E-sports Iris performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris
2905118949
61%39%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 and Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Mad Catz R.A.T. PRO X3 Vs Thermaltake Tt E-sports Iris comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!