Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Roccat Kain 200 AIMO vs Attack Shark X3 Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Roccat Attack Shark
Model Kain 200 AIMO X3
Photo Picture of Attack Shark X3 Mouse
Release Date 2019 2023
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~124 mm
~12.4 cm
~4.88 in
~118.5 mm
~11.85 cm
~4.67 in
Width ~65 mm
~6.5 cm
~2.56 in
~61 mm
~6.1 cm
~2.4 in
Height ~43 mm
~4.3 cm
~1.69 in
~39.7 mm
~3.97 cm
~1.56 in
Weight ~105 g
~0.11 kg
~0.23 lbs
~54 g
~0.05 kg
~0.12 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model Owl-Eye (PMW3335) PAW3395
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 - 16000 100 - 26000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 16000 26000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 100
Maximum Acceleration 40 G 50G
Max Tracking Speed 400 IPS 650 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1 ms) 1000 Hz (1 ms)
Lift Off Distance Adjustable, Default ~1.2 mm Adjustable (>1.0mm)
Switch Type Omron Kailh Black Mamba
Switch Lifespan 50 million clicks 80 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes Yes
Smoothing / Filtering No Yes
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 12.2 ms -
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Right-handed
Buttons 6 6
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes No
Adjustable Lighting Yes No
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black, White, Purple, Red, Orange
Battery Time 50 h 200h
Battery Type 1000mAh Lithium polymer
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 1 or 2 years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model Kain 200 AIMO X3
Picture Picture of Attack Shark X3 Mouse
Age 5 Years 1 Year
Relative Age 4 Years Older 4 Years Younger
User Rating 41% Better Score 41% Worse Score
Dimensions ~5.50 mm (or ~0.22 in) Longer
~4.00 mm (or ~0.16 in) Wider
~3.30 mm (or ~0.13 in) Higher
~5.50 mm (or ~0.22 in) Shorter
~4.00 mm (or ~0.16 in) Narrower
~3.30 mm (or ~0.13 in) Lower
Weight ~51.00 g or ~0.11 lbs Heavier ~51.00 g or ~0.11 lbs Lighter
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Smaller Range Larger Range
Max Resolution 38% Worse Max Res.
10000 Less DPI/CPI
38% Better Max Res.
10000 More DPI/CPI
Min Resolution Same Min Res. Same Min Res.
Maximum Acceleration 88% Better Max G 88% Worse Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 38% Worse Max IPS 38% Better Max IPS
Polling Rate Same Polling Rate Same Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Different Switch Tech Different Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan 38% Worse Lifespan 38% Better Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons Same Buttons Number Same Buttons Number
Battery Time 30 h Better Battery Duration 30 h Worse Battery Duration
Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Roccat Kain 200 AIMO Attack Shark X3
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Roccat Kain 200 AIMO and Attack Shark X3, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The Kain 200 AIMO is older, 5 years old, being released in the 2019, while the other one is younger, 1 years old, being released in the 2023. The production age difference is 4 year(s). This makes the X3 kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to X3 mouse, Kain 200 AIMO is ~5.50 mm (or ~0.22 in) Longer, ~4.00 mm (or ~0.16 in) Wider and ~3.30 mm (or ~0.13 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 12.8 mm (or 0.50 in) moderately bigger and better suiting greater hands.

Considering the weight, Roccat Kain 200 AIMO is 49% heavier, a difference of 51.00 g (0.11 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, Kain 200 AIMO is meant to be Ambidextrous while X3 is Right-handed. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Roccat Kain 200 AIMO sensor with the one of Attack Shark X3. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Owl-Eye (PMW3335) equipped by Kain 200 AIMO and PAW3395 used by X3. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Kain 200 AIMO provides 15900 DPI/CPI, while X3 offers 25900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, X3 is offering 38% better Max Resolution, 10000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Kain 200 AIMO shows a better value, 40 G, a great difference of 35 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, X3 shows a preferable value, 650 IPS, a great difference of 250 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Anyway, they offer adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of X3 is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, Kain 200 AIMO has a click latency of 12.2 ms which can be considered above the average, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Kain 200 AIMO and X3 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Kain 200 AIMO has Omron while X3 has Kailh Black Mamba; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 50 millions clicks while the second is 800 millions clicks, 38% worse Lifespan, a difference of 30 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a no difference of 0 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. The first one has a declared battery time of 50h (type: 1000mAh), the second one has a duration of 20h (type: Lithium polymer) meaning a difference of 30h. In the end, the features offered by Roccat Kain 200 AIMO are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Attack Shark X3 is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Kain 200 AIMO and X3 models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Kain 200 AIMO and X3 performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Roccat Kain 200 AIMO Attack Shark X3
2267919321
54%46%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Roccat Kain 200 AIMO and Attack Shark X3 specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Roccat Kain 200 AIMO Vs Attack Shark X3 comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!