Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
Manufacturer | Logitech | SteelSeries |
Model | G305 Lightspeed | Rival 310 |
Photo | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Your Rating | ||
Price (#Ad) |

Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
Length | ~116.6 mm ~11.66 cm ~4.59 in |
~127.6 mm ~12.76 cm ~5.02 in |
Width | ~62.15 mm ~6.22 cm ~2.45 in |
~70.1 mm ~7.01 cm ~2.76 in |
Height | ~38.2 mm ~3.82 cm ~1.5 in |
~41.98 mm ~4.2 cm ~1.65 in |
Weight | ~99 g ~0.1 kg ~0.22 lbs |
~88.3 g ~0.09 kg ~0.19 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Sensor Model | Hero | TrueMove3 |
Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 200 - 12000 | 100 - 12000 |
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 12000 | 12000 |
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 200 | 100 |
Maximum Acceleration | 40 G | 50 G |
Max Tracking Speed | 400 IPS | 350 IPS |
Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
Lift Off Distance | Adjustable (~1.2 mm with HQ cloths) | 1.2 mm |
Switch Type | Omron | Omron |
Switch Lifespan | 10 million clicks | 50 million clicks |
Feet (Material) | PTFE | PTFE |
Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
Click Latency | 6.3 ms | 12.5 ms |
Shift Latency | 9.17 ms | - |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming mouse |
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Ergonomy | Ambidextrous | Right-handed |
Buttons | ||
Suggested Grip | Claw grip, Fingertip grip | Palm grip, Claw grip |
DPI Indicator | Yes | Yes |
Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Weight | No | No |
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | No |
Silent Clicking | No | No |
Colors | Black, Blue, Lila, Teal, White | Black |
Battery Time | 250 h | - |
Battery Type | Single AA | - |

Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
Warranty | 2 Years | 1 Year |
Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
Model | G305 Lightspeed | Rival 310 |
Picture | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Age | 6 Years | 7 Years |
Relative Age | 1 Year Younger | 1 Year Older |
User Rating ☆ | 5% Worse Score | 5% Better Score |
Dimensions | ~11.00 mm (or ~0.43 in) Shorter ~7.95 mm (or ~0.31 in) Narrower ~3.78 mm (or ~0.15 in) Lower |
~11.00 mm (or ~0.43 in) Longer ~7.95 mm (or ~0.31 in) Wider ~3.78 mm (or ~0.15 in) Higher |
Weight | ~10.70 g or ~0.02 lbs Heavier | ~10.70 g or ~0.02 lbs Lighter |
Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Slightly Smaller Range | Slightly Larger Range |
Max Resolution | Same Max Res. | Same Max Res. |
Min Resolution | 50% Worse Min Res 100 Less DPI/CPI |
50% Better Min Res 100 More DPI/CPI |
Maximum Acceleration | 20% Worse Max G | 20% Better Max G |
Maximum Tracking Speed | 13% Better Max IPS | 13% Worse Max IPS |
Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate |
Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance |
Switch Type | Same Switch Tech | Same Switch Tech |
Switch Lifespan | 80% Worse Lifespan | 80% Better Lifespan |
Feet Material Type | Same Feet Material | Same Feet Material |
Number of Buttons | Same Buttons Number | Same Buttons Number |
Battery Time | ||
Click Latency | 50% Better Click Latency | 50% Worse Click Latency |
Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
Compare Price #Ad |
Logitech G305 Lightspeed | SteelSeries Rival 310 |

Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Logitech G305 Lightspeed and SteelSeries Rival 310, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 6 years old, being released in the 2018, while Rival 310 is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017. The production age difference is 1 year(s). This makes the G305 Lightspeed a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Rival 310 mouse, G305 Lightspeed is ~11.00 mm (or ~0.43 in) Shorter, ~7.95 mm (or ~0.31 in) Narrower and ~3.78 mm (or ~0.15 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 22.73 mm (or -0.89 in) significantly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Logitech G305 Lightspeed is 11% heavier, a difference of 10.70 g (0.02 lbs), which can be considered moderately significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, G305 Lightspeed is meant to be Ambidextrous while Rival 310 is Right-handed. They offer different grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by G305 Lightspeed while Rival 310 has Palm grip, Claw grip; however, the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 2.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Logitech G305 Lightspeed sensor with the one of SteelSeries Rival 310. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Hero equipped by G305 Lightspeed and TrueMove3 used by Rival 310. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the G305 Lightspeed provides 11800 DPI/CPI, while Rival 310 offers 11900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has slightly larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). They are offering the same Max Resolution, 12000 DPI/CPI, meaning that for the same length of shift the mice will recognize the same amount of movement, "reading" equal dots per inch and, in other words, they will move with the same speed on the screen.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Rival 310 shows a better value, 50 G, a small difference of 10 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, G305 Lightspeed shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a small difference of 50 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, G305 Lightspeed and Rival 310 share a Lift Off distance of 1.2 mm, above this one they will not work accurately. Anyway, G305 Lightspeed offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Logitech G305 Lightspeed has lower click latency than SteelSeries Rival 310, a great difference of 6.20 ms, 50% better Click Latency, which can be evaluated very significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Rival 310 is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, G305 Lightspeed has a shift latency of 9.17 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with the same Switch Technology, Omron; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 10 millions clicks while the second is 500 millions clicks, 80% worse Lifespan, a difference of 40 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a no difference of 0 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Logitech G305 Lightspeed are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while SteelSeries Rival 310 is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the G305 Lightspeed and Rival 310 models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the G305 Lightspeed and Rival 310 performance in different utilization environments.
Logitech G305 Lightspeed | SteelSeries Rival 310 |
24777 | 23223 |
52% | 48% |
Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Logitech G305 Lightspeed Vs SteelSeries Rival 310 comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!