The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Darmoshark M3s Mini and Attack Shark X3, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The mice are aged similarly, 1 years old, being released in the 2023.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to X3 mouse, M3s Mini is ~3.50 mm (or ~0.14 in) Longer, ~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Wider and ~1.90 mm (or ~0.07 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 3.1 mm (or 0.12 in) different in size and not significantly influencing the choice based on own's hand size.
Considering the weight, Darmoshark M3s Mini has the same value of Attack Shark X3. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer different grip, Palm grip by M3s Mini while X3 has Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; this last one can be considered more adaptable, with a number of grip possibilities equal to 3 instead of the 1 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Darmoshark M3s Mini sensor with the one of Attack Shark X3. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, and the same sensor model PAW3395. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer the same resolution range (DPImax - DPImin) of 25900 DPI/CPI in which you can pick up the sensitivity that mostly suits your needs. They are offering the same Max Resolution, 26000 DPI/CPI, meaning that for the same length of shift the mice will recognize the same amount of movement, "reading" equal dots per inch and, in other words, they will move with the same speed on the screen.
As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, M3s Mini shows a better value, 50 G, a great difference of 45 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, they have the same spec of 650 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
M3s Mini has a Polling Rate of 2000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 0.50 ms, while X3 is characterized by 1000 Hz or an input every 1.00 ms, making this last one having 50% worse Polling Rate. Anyway, they offer adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of X3 is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, M3s Mini has a click latency of 3.5 ms which can be considered very good, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare M3s Mini and X3 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, M3s Mini has TTC Golden Micro Dustproof while X3 has Kailh Black Mamba; moreover, they have the same life span of 80 millions clicks. The Feet Material is better for M3s Mini, being this Virgin Grade PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 5 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a small difference of 1 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. The first one has a declared battery time of 100h (type: Lithium polymer), the second one has a duration of 20h (type: Lithium polymer) meaning a difference of 80h. In the end, the feature offered by Darmoshark M3s Mini is On board Memory, while Attack Shark X3 is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator.
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the M3s Mini and X3 models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the M3s Mini and X3 performance in different utilization environments.
Comparison Score
Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.
➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer. ➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them. ➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years. ➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices. ➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer:The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!
