The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Cougar Revenger S and SteelSeries Rival 600, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The Revenger S is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017, while the other one is younger, 6 years old, being released in the 2018. The production age difference is 1 year(s). This makes the Rival 600 a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Rival 600 mouse, Revenger S is ~1.00 mm (or ~0.04 in) Shorter, ~4.00 mm (or ~0.16 in) Narrower and ~Same Height, which makes it, overally, 5 mm (or -0.20 in) slightly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Cougar Revenger S is 2% lighter, a difference of 2.00 g (0.00 lbs), which can be considered not so significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. However, Rival 600 offers weight personalization (addable weights or editable shape) while Revenger S does not.
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Cougar Revenger S sensor with the one of SteelSeries Rival 600. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3360 equipped by Revenger S and TrueMove3+ used by Rival 600. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer the same resolution range (DPImax - DPImin) of 11900 DPI/CPI in which you can pick up the sensitivity that mostly suits your needs. They are offering the same Max Resolution, 12000 DPI/CPI, meaning that for the same length of shift the mice will recognize the same amount of movement, "reading" equal dots per inch and, in other words, they will move with the same speed on the screen.
As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 50 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Rival 600 shows a preferable value, 350 IPS, a moderate difference of 100 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
Revenger S has a Polling Rate of 2000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 0.50 ms, while Rival 600 is characterized by 1000 Hz or an input every 1.00 ms, making this last one having 50% worse Polling Rate. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Cougar Revenger S has higher click latency than SteelSeries Rival 600, a consistent difference of 5.50 ms, 29% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Revenger S and Rival 600 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Revenger S has Omron while Rival 600 has SteelSeries Switches; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 20 millions clicks while the second is 600 millions clicks, 67% worse Lifespan, a difference of 40 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is different, Revenger S (PTFE) and Rival 600 (Unknown). Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 7 offered by the second one, a small difference of 1 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Cougar Revenger S are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while SteelSeries Rival 600 is giving On board Memory, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Revenger S and Rival 600 models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Revenger S and Rival 600 performance in different utilization environments.
Comparison Score
Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.
➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer. ➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them. ➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years. ➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices. ➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer:The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!
