Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
| Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
| Manufacturer | Lamzu | Razer |
| Model | Atlantis Mini | Naga V2 HyperSpeed |
| Photo |  |
 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
| Your Rating | ||
| Price (#Ad) |
Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
| Length | ~117 mm ~11.7 cm ~4.61 in |
~119.5 mm ~11.95 cm ~4.7 in |
| Width | ~63 mm ~6.3 cm ~2.48 in |
~75 mm ~7.5 cm ~2.95 in |
| Height | ~37 mm ~3.7 cm ~1.46 in |
~43.5 mm ~4.35 cm ~1.71 in |
| Weight | ~51 g ~0.05 kg ~0.11 lbs |
~95 g ~0.1 kg ~0.21 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Sensor Model | PAW3395 | Focus Pro 30K |
| Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 50 - 26000 | 100 - 30000 |
| Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 26000 | 30000 |
| Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 50 | 100 |
| Maximum Acceleration | 50 G | 50 G |
| Max Tracking Speed | 650 IPS | 750 IPS |
| Polling Rate | 4000 Hz (0.25ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
| Lift Off Distance | Low, ~1.2mm | 1.2 mm |
| Switch Type | TTC Silver | Optical Gen-2 |
| Switch Lifespan | 30 million clicks | 60 million clicks |
| Feet (Material) | Virgin Grade PTFE | Virgin Grade PTFE |
| Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
| Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
| Click Latency | 2.85 ms | 4.1 ms |
| Shift Latency | - | 8.11 ms |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
| Mouse Type | Gaming | Gaming mouse |
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Ergonomy | Ambidextrous | Right-handed |
| Buttons | ||
| Suggested Grip | Palm grip, Claw grip | Palm grip, Claw grip |
| DPI Indicator | Yes | No |
| Lighting | No | No |
| Adjustable Lighting | No | No |
| Adjustable Weight | No | No |
| Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | Yes |
| Silent Clicking | Yes | No |
| Colors | Matcha Green, Miami Blue, Polar White | Black |
| Battery Time | 70 h (300 mAh) | 250 h |
| Battery Type | Lithium polymer | Lithium polymer |
Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
| Warranty | 1 or 2 years | 1 or 2 years |
| Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
| Model | Atlantis Mini | Naga V2 HyperSpeed |
| Picture | |
|
| Age | 1 Year | 2 Years |
| Relative Age | 1 Year Younger | 1 Year Older |
| User Rating ☆ | 15% Better Score | 15% Worse Score |
| Dimensions | ~2.50 mm (or ~0.10 in) Shorter ~12.00 mm (or ~0.47 in) Narrower ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Lower |
~2.50 mm (or ~0.10 in) Longer ~12.00 mm (or ~0.47 in) Wider ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Higher |
| Weight | ~44.00 g or ~0.10 lbs Lighter | ~44.00 g or ~0.10 lbs Heavier |
| Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
| Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Smaller Range | Larger Range |
| Max Resolution | 13% Worse Max Res. 4000 Less DPI/CPI |
13% Better Max Res. 4000 More DPI/CPI |
| Min Resolution | 50% Better Min Res. 50 More DPI/CPI |
50% Worse Min Res. 50 Less DPI/CPI |
| Maximum Acceleration | Same Max G | Same Max G |
| Maximum Tracking Speed | 13% Worse Max IPS | 13% Better Max IPS |
| Polling Rate | 75% Better Polling Rate | 75% Worse Polling Rate |
| Lift Off Distance | ||
| Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
| Switch Lifespan | 50% Worse Lifespan | 50% Better Lifespan |
| Feet Material Type | Same Feet Material | Same Feet Material |
| Number of Buttons | 14 Less Buttons | 14 More Buttons |
| Battery Time | 180 h Worse Battery Duration | 180 h better Battery Duration |
| Click Latency | 30% Better Click Latency | 30% Worse Click Latency |
| Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
| Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
| Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
| Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
| Compare Price #Ad |
Lamzu Atlantis Mini | Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed |
Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Lamzu Atlantis Mini and Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, mice have different utilization aim, Atlantis Mini is meant to be Gaming while Naga V2 HyperSpeed, instead, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 1 years old, being released in the 2023, while Naga V2 HyperSpeed is older, 2 years old, being released in the 2022. The production age difference is 1 year(s). This makes the Atlantis Mini a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Naga V2 HyperSpeed mouse, Atlantis Mini is ~2.50 mm (or ~0.10 in) Shorter, ~12.00 mm (or ~0.47 in) Narrower and ~6.50 mm (or ~0.26 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 21 mm (or -0.83 in) significantly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Lamzu Atlantis Mini is 46% lighter, a difference of 44.00 g (0.10 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, Atlantis Mini is meant to be Ambidextrous while Naga V2 HyperSpeed is Right-handed. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 2.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Lamzu Atlantis Mini sensor with the one of Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PAW3395 equipped by Atlantis Mini and Focus Pro 30K used by Naga V2 HyperSpeed. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Atlantis Mini provides 25950 DPI/CPI, while Naga V2 HyperSpeed offers 29900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Naga V2 HyperSpeed is offering 13% better Max Resolution, 4000 More DPI/CPI.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 50 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Naga V2 HyperSpeed shows a preferable value, 750 IPS, a moderate difference of 100 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
Atlantis Mini has a Polling Rate of 4000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 0.25 ms, while Naga V2 HyperSpeed is characterized by 1000 Hz or an input every 1.00 ms, making this last one having 75% worse Polling Rate. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Lamzu Atlantis Mini has lower click latency than Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed, a small difference of 1.25 ms, 30% better Click Latency, which can be evaluated not really significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Atlantis Mini is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, Naga V2 HyperSpeed has a shift latency of 8.11 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Atlantis Mini has TTC Silver while Naga V2 HyperSpeed has Optical Gen-2; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 30 millions clicks while the second is 600 millions clicks, 50% worse Lifespan, a difference of 30 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is the same, Virgin Grade PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 20 offered by the second one, a great difference of 14 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. The first one has a declared battery time of 70h (type: Lithium polymer), the second one has a duration of 250h (type: Lithium polymer) meaning a difference of 180h. In the end, the features offered by Lamzu Atlantis Mini are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, Silent Clicking, while Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed is giving On board Memory, Adjustable Scroll-Wheel Resistance.
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Atlantis Mini and Naga V2 HyperSpeed models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Atlantis Mini and Naga V2 HyperSpeed performance in different utilization environments.
| Lamzu Atlantis Mini | Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed |
| 24546 | 20454 |
| 55% | 45% |
| Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
| Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
| Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Lamzu Atlantis Mini Vs Razer Naga V2 HyperSpeed comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!