The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Mad Catz M.M.O. 7+ and Roccat Kone Pro, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The M.M.O. 7+ is older, 12 years old, being released in the 2012, while the other one is younger, 3 years old, being released in the 2021. The production age difference is 9 year(s). This makes the Kone Pro kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Kone Pro mouse, M.M.O. 7+ is ~9.00 mm (or ~0.35 in) Shorter, ~15.00 mm (or ~0.59 in) Wider and ~10.00 mm (or ~0.39 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 4 mm (or -0.16 in) different in size and not significantly influencing the choice based on own's hand size.
Considering the weight, Mad Catz M.M.O. 7+ is 56% heavier, a difference of 84.00 g (0.18 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. However, M.M.O. 7+ offers weight personalization (addable weights or editable shape) while Kone Pro does not.
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Mad Catz M.M.O. 7+ sensor with the one of Roccat Kone Pro. The two mice do not share the same sensor technology, that is Laser for the first one, Optical for the second one; they also have different sensor model: Twin-Eye equipped by M.M.O. 7+ and Owl-Eye 19K (PMW3370) used by Kone Pro. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the M.M.O. 7+ provides 6375 DPI/CPI, while Kone Pro offers 18900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has way larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Kone Pro is offering 66% better Max Resolution, 12600 More DPI/CPI.
As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 50 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Kone Pro shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a significant difference of 150 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Anyway, Kone Pro offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of M.M.O. 7+ is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, Kone Pro has a click latency of 7.4 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare M.M.O. 7+ and Kone Pro shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, M.M.O. 7+ has Unknown while Kone Pro has Titan Optical Switches; The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 15 offered by first mouse and 5 offered by the second one, a great difference of 10 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Mad Catz M.M.O. 7+ are DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Roccat Kone Pro is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.
Check R.A.T. 8+ Specs
#AD
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the M.M.O. 7+ and Kone Pro models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the M.M.O. 7+ and Kone Pro performance in different utilization environments.
Comparison Score
Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.
➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer. ➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them. ➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years. ➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices. ➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer:The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!
