Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
Manufacturer | Thermaltake | Logitech |
Model | eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced | G403 Hero |
Photo | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Your Rating | ||
Price (#Ad) |

Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
Length | ~130.75 mm ~13.08 cm ~5.15 in |
~124 mm ~12.4 cm ~4.88 in |
Width | ~87.35 mm ~8.74 cm ~3.44 in |
~68 mm ~6.8 cm ~2.68 in |
Height | ~40.53 mm ~4.05 cm ~1.6 in |
~43 mm ~4.3 cm ~1.69 in |
Weight | ~125 g ~0.13 kg ~0.28 lbs |
~87.3 g ~0.09 kg ~0.19 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
Sensor Type | Laser | Optical |
Sensor Model | Avago ADNS-9800 | HERO 16K |
Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 400 - 16000 | 100 - 16000 |
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 16000 | 16000 |
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 400 | 100 |
Maximum Acceleration | 50 G | 40 G |
Max Tracking Speed | 150 IPS | 400 IPS |
Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
Lift Off Distance | Unknown | Low, ~2.0 mm |
Switch Type | Omron | Logitech Mechanical Switches |
Switch Lifespan | 50 million clicks | - |
Feet (Material) | PTFE | Unknown |
Onboard Memory | Yes | Unknown |
Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
Hardware Acceleration | Yes | No |
Click Latency | - | 9.2 ms |
Shift Latency | - | 7.67 ms |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming |
Sensor Type | Laser | Optical |
Ergonomy | Right-handed | Right-handed |
Buttons | ||
Suggested Grip | Palm grip, Claw grip | Palm grip |
DPI Indicator | Yes | No |
Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Weight | No | Yes (10g) |
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | No |
Silent Clicking | No | No |
Colors | Black | Black |
Battery Time | - | - |
Battery Type | - | - |

Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
Warranty | 2 Years | 2 Years |
Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
Model | eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced | G403 Hero |
Picture | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Age | 8 Years | 5 Years |
Relative Age | 3 Years Older | 3 Years Younger |
User Rating ☆ | 19% Worse Score | 19% Better Score |
Dimensions | ~6.75 mm (or ~0.27 in) Longer ~19.35 mm (or ~0.76 in) Wider ~2.47 mm (or ~0.10 in) Lower |
~6.75 mm (or ~0.27 in) Shorter ~19.35 mm (or ~0.76 in) Narrower ~2.47 mm (or ~0.10 in) Higher |
Weight | ~37.70 g or ~0.08 lbs Heavier | ~37.70 g or ~0.08 lbs Lighter |
Sensor Type & Model | Different Tech and Model | Different Tech and Model |
Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Slightly Smaller Range | Slightly Larger Range |
Max Resolution | Same Max Res. | Same Max Res. |
Min Resolution | 75% Worse Min Res 300 Less DPI/CPI |
75% Better Min Res 300 More DPI/CPI |
Maximum Acceleration | 20% Better Max G | 20% Worse Max G |
Maximum Tracking Speed | 63% Worse Max IPS | 63% Better Max IPS |
Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate |
Lift Off Distance | ||
Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
Switch Lifespan | ||
Feet Material Type | Different Feet Material | Different Feet Material |
Number of Buttons | 4 More Buttons | 4 Less Buttons |
Battery Time | ||
Click Latency | ||
Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
Compare Price #Ad |
Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced | Logitech G403 Hero |

Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced and Logitech G403 Hero, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, mice have different utilization aim, eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is meant to be Gaming mouse while G403 Hero, instead, Gaming. The eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is older, 8 years old, being released in the 2016, while the other one is younger, 5 years old, being released in the 2019. The production age difference is 3 year(s). This makes the G403 Hero kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to G403 Hero mouse, eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is ~6.75 mm (or ~0.27 in) Longer, ~19.35 mm (or ~0.76 in) Wider and ~2.47 mm (or ~0.10 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 23.63 mm (or 0.93 in) significantly bigger and better suiting greater hands.
Considering the weight, Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is 30% heavier, a difference of 37.70 g (0.08 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. However, G403 Hero offers weight personalization (addable weights or editable shape) while eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced does not.
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip by eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced while G403 Hero has Palm grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 2 instead of the 1 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced sensor with the one of Logitech G403 Hero. The two mice do not share the same sensor technology, that is Laser for the first one, Optical for the second one; they also have different sensor model: Avago ADNS-9800 equipped by eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced and HERO 16K used by G403 Hero. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced provides 15600 DPI/CPI, while G403 Hero offers 15900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has slightly larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). They are offering the same Max Resolution, 16000 DPI/CPI, meaning that for the same length of shift the mice will recognize the same amount of movement, "reading" equal dots per inch and, in other words, they will move with the same speed on the screen.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced shows a better value, 50 G, a small difference of 10 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, G403 Hero shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a great difference of 250 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, G403 Hero has a click latency of 9.2 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, G403 Hero has a shift latency of 7.67 ms which can be considered very good , compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced has Omron while G403 Hero has Logitech Mechanical Switches; The Feet Material is different, eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced (PTFE) and G403 Hero (Unknown). Considering the available Number of Buttons, 10 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a moderate difference of 4 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Logitech G403 Hero is giving RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced and G403 Hero models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced and G403 Hero performance in different utilization environments.
Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced | Logitech G403 Hero |
20412 | 21588 |
49% | 51% |
Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Thermaltake eSPORTS Level 10 M Advanced Vs Logitech G403 Hero comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!