Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
| Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
| Manufacturer | Razer | Asus |
| Model | Viper V3 Hyperspeed | ROG Chakram X |
| Photo |  |
 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
| Your Rating | ||
| Price (#Ad) |
Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
| Length | ~127.1 mm ~12.71 cm ~5 in |
~132.7 mm ~13.27 cm ~5.22 in |
| Width | ~63.9 mm ~6.39 cm ~2.52 in |
~76.6 mm ~7.66 cm ~3.02 in |
| Height | ~39.9 mm ~3.99 cm ~1.57 in |
~42.8 mm ~4.28 cm ~1.69 in |
| Weight | ~82 g ~0.08 kg ~0.18 lbs |
~127 g ~0.13 kg ~0.28 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Sensor Model | Focus Pro 30K | PMW3395 |
| Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 - 30000 | 100 - 36000 |
| Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 30000 | 36000 |
| Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum Acceleration | 70 G | 50 G |
| Max Tracking Speed | 750 IPS | 650 IPS |
| Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1 ms) | 8000 Hz (0.125 ms) |
| Lift Off Distance | Adjustable (>1.2 mm) | 1.2 mm |
| Switch Type | Mechanical Switches 2nd Gen | Omron |
| Switch Lifespan | 60 million clicks | 70 million clicks |
| Feet (Material) | Virgin Grade PTFE | PTFE |
| Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
| Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
| Click Latency | 1.4 ms | 0.1 ms / 2.2 ms (wireless) |
| Shift Latency | - | - |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
| Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming mouse |
| Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
| Ergonomy | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Buttons | ||
| Suggested Grip | Palm grip, Claw grip | Palm grip |
| DPI Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Lighting | No | Yes |
| Adjustable Lighting | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable Weight | No | No |
| Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | No |
| Silent Clicking | No | No |
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Battery Time | 280 h | 150 hours |
| Battery Type | AA | Lithium polymer |
Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
| Warranty | 1 or 2 years | 2 years |
| Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
| Model | Viper V3 Hyperspeed | ROG Chakram X |
| Picture | |
|
| Age | 1 Year | 2 Years |
| Relative Age | 1 Year Younger | 1 Year Older |
| User Rating ☆ | 32% Worse Score | 32% Better Score |
| Dimensions | ~5.60 mm (or ~0.22 in) Shorter ~12.70 mm (or ~0.50 in) Narrower ~2.90 mm (or ~0.11 in) Lower |
~5.60 mm (or ~0.22 in) Longer ~12.70 mm (or ~0.50 in) Wider ~2.90 mm (or ~0.11 in) Higher |
| Weight | ~45.00 g or ~0.10 lbs Lighter | ~45.00 g or ~0.10 lbs Heavier |
| Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
| Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Smaller Range | Larger Range |
| Max Resolution | 17% Worse Max Res. 6000 Less DPI/CPI |
17% Better Max Res. 6000 More DPI/CPI |
| Min Resolution | Same Min Res. | Same Min Res. |
| Maximum Acceleration | 29% Better Max G | 29% Worse Max G |
| Maximum Tracking Speed | 13% Better Max IPS | 13% Worse Max IPS |
| Polling Rate | 88% Worse Polling Rate | 88% Better Polling Rate |
| Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance | Same Lift Off Distance |
| Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
| Switch Lifespan | 14% Worse Lifespan | 14% Better Lifespan |
| Feet Material Type | Better Feet Material | Worse Feet Material |
| Number of Buttons | 5 Less Buttons | 5 More Buttons |
| Battery Time | 130 h Better Battery Duration | 130 h Worse Battery Duration |
| Click Latency | 93% Worse Click Latency | 93% Better Click Latency |
| Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
| Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
| Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
| Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
| Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
| Compare Price #Ad |
Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed | Asus ROG Chakram X |
Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed and Asus ROG Chakram X, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The first one is younger, 1 years old, being released in the 2023, while ROG Chakram X is older, 2 years old, being released in the 2022. The production age difference is 1 year(s). This makes the Viper V3 Hyperspeed a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to ROG Chakram X mouse, Viper V3 Hyperspeed is ~5.60 mm (or ~0.22 in) Shorter, ~12.70 mm (or ~0.50 in) Narrower and ~2.90 mm (or ~0.11 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 21.2 mm (or -0.83 in) significantly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.
Considering the weight, Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed is 35% lighter, a difference of 45.00 g (0.10 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .
Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip by Viper V3 Hyperspeed while ROG Chakram X has Palm grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 2 instead of the 1 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed sensor with the one of Asus ROG Chakram X. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Focus Pro 30K equipped by Viper V3 Hyperspeed and PMW3395 used by ROG Chakram X. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Viper V3 Hyperspeed provides 29900 DPI/CPI, while ROG Chakram X offers 35900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, ROG Chakram X is offering 17% better Max Resolution, 6000 More DPI/CPI.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Viper V3 Hyperspeed shows a better value, 70 G, a moderate difference of 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Viper V3 Hyperspeed shows a preferable value, 750 IPS, a moderate difference of 100 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
Viper V3 Hyperspeed has a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms, while ROG Chakram X is characterized by 8000 Hz or an input every 0.13 ms, making this last one having 88% better Polling Rate. Lastly, Viper V3 Hyperspeed and ROG Chakram X share a Lift Off distance of 1.2 mm, above this one they will not work accurately. Anyway, Viper V3 Hyperspeed offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed has higher click latency than Asus ROG Chakram X, a small difference of 1.30 ms, 93% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated not really significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Viper V3 Hyperspeed and ROG Chakram X shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Viper V3 Hyperspeed has Mechanical Switches 2nd Gen while ROG Chakram X has Omron; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 60 millions clicks while the second is 700 millions clicks, 14% worse Lifespan, a difference of 10 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is better for Viper V3 Hyperspeed, being this Virgin Grade PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 11 offered by the second one, a moderate difference of 5 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. The first one has a declared battery time of 280h (type: AA), the second one has a duration of 150h (type: Lithium polymer) meaning a difference of 130h. In the end, the features offered by Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, Customizable RGB, while Asus ROG Chakram X is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.
Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Viper V3 Hyperspeed and ROG Chakram X models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Viper V3 Hyperspeed and ROG Chakram X performance in different utilization environments.
| Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed | Asus ROG Chakram X |
| 18063 | 29937 |
| 38% | 62% |
| Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
| Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
| Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Razer Viper V3 Hyperspeed Vs Asus ROG Chakram X comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!