Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Thermaltake Black FP vs Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Thermaltake Mad Catz
Model Black FP R.A.T. 8+ ADV
Photo
Release Date 2016 2020
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~121 mm
~12.1 cm
~4.76 in
~119 mm
~11.9 cm
~4.69 in
Width ~69 mm
~6.9 cm
~2.72 in
~88 mm
~8.8 cm
~3.46 in
Height ~41 mm
~4.1 cm
~1.61 in
~39 mm
~3.9 cm
~1.54 in
Weight ~0 g
~0 kg
~0 lbs
~157 g
~0.16 kg
~0.35 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Laser Optical
Sensor Model Avago ADNS-9500 PMW3389
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 - 5700 100 - 20000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 5700 20000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 100
Maximum Acceleration 30 G 50 G
Max Tracking Speed 150 IPS 400 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 2000 Hz (0.5 ms)
Lift Off Distance Adjustable, >1.0 mm Adjustable (~2.0 mm default)
Switch Type Omron Dakota
Switch Lifespan - 60 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes Yes
Smoothing / Filtering Yes No
Hardware Acceleration Yes No
Click Latency - 19.4 ms
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Laser Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Right-handed
Buttons 7 11
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting No Yes
Adjustable Weight Yes (5x4.5g) Yes
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Red
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 1 Year
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model Black FP R.A.T. 8+ ADV
Picture
Age 8 Years 4 Years
Relative Age 4 Years Older 4 Years Younger
User Rating 5% Worse Score 5% Better Score
Dimensions ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Longer
~19.00 mm (or ~0.75 in) Narrower
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Higher
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Shorter
~19.00 mm (or ~0.75 in) Wider
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Lower
Weight ~157.00 g or ~0.35 lbs Lighter ~157.00 g or ~0.35 lbs Heavier
Sensor Type & Model Different Tech and Model Different Tech and Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Way Smaller Range Way Larger Range
Max Resolution 72% Worse Max Res.
14300 Less DPI/CPI
72% Better Max Res.
14300 More DPI/CPI
Min Resolution Same Min Res. Same Min Res.
Maximum Acceleration 40% Worse Max G 40% Better Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 63% Worse Max IPS 63% Better Max IPS
Polling Rate 50% Worse Polling Rate 50% Better Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Smaller Lift Off Distance Greater Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Different Switch Tech Different Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons 4 Less Buttons 4 More Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Thermaltake Black FP Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Thermaltake Black FP and Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The Black FP is older, 8 years old, being released in the 2016, while the other one is younger, 4 years old, being released in the 2020. The production age difference is 4 year(s). This makes the R.A.T. 8+ ADV kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to R.A.T. 8+ ADV mouse, Black FP is ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Longer, ~19.00 mm (or ~0.75 in) Narrower and ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 15 mm (or -0.59 in) moderately smaller and better suiting tinier hands.

Considering the weight, Thermaltake Black FP is 0% lighter, a difference of 157.00 g (0.35 lbs), which can be considered very significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. However, both mice offer weight personalization (addable weights or editable shape).

Regarding the Ergonomy, Black FP is meant to be Ambidextrous while R.A.T. 8+ ADV is Right-handed. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Thermaltake Black FP sensor with the one of Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV. The two mice do not share the same sensor technology, that is Laser for the first one, Optical for the second one; they also have different sensor model: Avago ADNS-9500 equipped by Black FP and PMW3389 used by R.A.T. 8+ ADV. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Black FP provides 5600 DPI/CPI, while R.A.T. 8+ ADV offers 19900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has way larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, R.A.T. 8+ ADV is offering 72% better Max Resolution, 14300 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, R.A.T. 8+ ADV shows a better value, 50 G, a moderate difference of 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, R.A.T. 8+ ADV shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a great difference of 250 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

Black FP has a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms, while R.A.T. 8+ ADV is characterized by 2000 Hz or an input every 0.50 ms, making this last one having 50% better Polling Rate. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of R.A.T. 8+ ADV shows an higher value, 2 mm, a great difference of 1.00 mm. Anyway, they offer adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice click latency, since the data of Black FP is missing. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. However, R.A.T. 8+ ADV has a click latency of 19.4 ms which can be considered not so good, compared to a medium quality mouse. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Black FP and R.A.T. 8+ ADV shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Black FP has Omron while R.A.T. 8+ ADV has Dakota; The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 7 offered by first mouse and 11 offered by the second one, a moderate difference of 4 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Thermaltake Black FP are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, while Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Black FP and R.A.T. 8+ ADV models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Black FP and R.A.T. 8+ ADV performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Thermaltake Black FP Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV
1847729523
38%62%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Thermaltake Black FP and Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Thermaltake Black FP Vs Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ ADV comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!