Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Ozone Neon X40 vs Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Ozone Finalmouse
Model Neon X40 Ultralight Phantom
Photo
Release Date 2018 2018
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~125 mm
~12.5 cm
~4.92 in
~122 mm
~12.2 cm
~4.8 in
Width ~64 mm
~6.4 cm
~2.52 in
~66 mm
~6.6 cm
~2.6 in
Height ~39 mm
~3.9 cm
~1.54 in
~39 mm
~3.9 cm
~1.54 in
Weight ~98 g
~0.1 kg
~0.22 lbs
~67 g
~0.07 kg
~0.15 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model PMW3330 PMW3360
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 400 - 7200 400 - 3200
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 7200 3200
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 400 400
Maximum Acceleration 30 G 50 G
Max Tracking Speed 150 IPS 250 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 500 Hz (2 ms)
Lift Off Distance >1.2 mm Pad variance, >1.2 mm
Switch Type Omron Omron
Switch Lifespan 20 million clicks 20 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes No
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency - -
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Ambidextrous
Buttons 8 6
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip
DPI Indicator Yes No
Lighting Yes No
Adjustable Lighting Yes No
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black with spots
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 3 Years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model Neon X40 Ultralight Phantom
Picture
Age 6 Years 6 Years
Relative Age Same Age Same Age
User Rating 44% Worse Score 44% Better Score
Dimensions ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Longer
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Narrower
~Same Height
~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Shorter
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Wider
~Same Height
Weight ~31.00 g or ~0.07 lbs Heavier ~31.00 g or ~0.07 lbs Lighter
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Way Larger Range Way Smaller Range
Max Resolution 56% Better Max Res
4000 More DPI/CPI
56% Worse Max Res
4000 Less DPI/CPI
Min Resolution Same Min Res. Same Min Res.
Maximum Acceleration 40% Worse Max G 40% Better Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 40% Worse Max IPS 40% Better Max IPS
Polling Rate 50% Better Polling Rate 50% Worse Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Same Lift Off Distance Same Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Same Switch Tech Same Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan Same Lifespan Same Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons 2 More Buttons 2 Less Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Ozone Neon X40 Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Ozone Neon X40 and Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The mice are aged similarly, 6 years old, being released in the 2018.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Ultralight Phantom mouse, Neon X40 is ~3.00 mm (or ~0.12 in) Longer, ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Narrower and ~Same Height, which makes it, overally, 1 mm (or 0.04 in) different in size and not significantly influencing the choice based on own's hand size.

Considering the weight, Ozone Neon X40 is 32% heavier, a difference of 31.00 g (0.07 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice can be used with right or left hand. They offer the same grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip; the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 3.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Ozone Neon X40 sensor with the one of Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3330 equipped by Neon X40 and PMW3360 used by Ultralight Phantom. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Neon X40 provides 6800 DPI/CPI, while Ultralight Phantom offers 2800 DPI/CPI, meaning that the first one has way larger range. Consider picking up the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Neon X40 is offering 56% better Max Resolution, 4000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Ultralight Phantom shows a better value, 50 G, a moderate difference of 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Ultralight Phantom shows a preferable value, 250 IPS, a moderate difference of 100 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

Neon X40 has a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words it reports data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms, while Ultralight Phantom is characterized by 500 Hz or an input every 2.00 ms, making this last one having 50% worse Polling Rate. Lastly, Neon X40 and Ultralight Phantom share a Lift Off distance of 1.2 mm, above this one they will not work accurately. Anyway, they do not offer adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

At the moment there is no available data to compare Neon X40 and Ultralight Phantom click latency. We apologize for the inconvenience, you can request priority data update through the contact page. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare Neon X40 and Ultralight Phantom shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with the same Switch Technology, Omron; moreover, they have the same life span of 20 millions clicks. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 8 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a small difference of 2 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom is not offering features such as On Board Memory, Adjustable Scrool Wheel or Silent Click (etc.), while Ozone Neon X40 is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Neon X40 and Ultralight Phantom models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Neon X40 and Ultralight Phantom performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Ozone Neon X40 Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom
2123117769
54%46%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Ozone Neon X40 and Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Ozone Neon X40 Vs Finalmouse Ultralight Phantom comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!