Comparison and Difference Between
Use dropdown menus to compare different models.
Compare Mice |
Mouse Details
Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.
Manufacturer | Corsair | Razer |
Model | Ironclaw RGB | Naga V2 Pro |
Photo | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Your Rating | ||
Price (#Ad) |

Dimensions and Weight
Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).
Length | ~130 mm ~13 cm ~5.12 in |
~119.5 mm ~11.95 cm ~4.7 in |
Width | ~80 mm ~8 cm ~3.15 in |
~75.5 mm ~7.55 cm ~2.97 in |
Height | ~45 mm ~4.5 cm ~1.77 in |
~43.5 mm ~4.35 cm ~1.71 in |
Weight | ~105 g ~0.11 kg ~0.23 lbs |
~134 g ~0.13 kg ~0.3 lbs |
Technical Specs
Full tech specifications of the given mice.
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Sensor Model | PMW3391 | Focus Pro 30K |
Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 - 18000 | 100 - 30000 |
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 18000 | 30000 |
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) | 100 | 100 |
Maximum Acceleration | 50 G | 70 G |
Max Tracking Speed | 250 IPS | 750 IPS |
Polling Rate | 1000 Hz (1ms) | 1000 Hz (1ms) |
Lift Off Distance | High by default (Adjustable) >2.5 mm | 1.2 mm |
Switch Type | Omron | Optical Gen-3 |
Switch Lifespan | 50 million clicks | 90 million clicks |
Feet (Material) | PTFE | Virgin Grade PTFE |
Onboard Memory | Yes | Yes |
Smoothing / Filtering | No | No |
Hardware Acceleration | No | No |
Click Latency | 7.6 ms | 3.4 ms |
Shift Latency | - | 11.61 ms |
Accessories and Features
Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.
Mouse Type | Gaming mouse | Gaming mouse |
Sensor Type | Optical | Optical |
Ergonomy | Right-handed | Right-handed |
Buttons | ||
Suggested Grip | Palm grip | Palm grip, Claw grip |
DPI Indicator | Yes | Yes |
Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Lighting | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Weight | No | Adjustable Shape |
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance | No | Yes |
Silent Clicking | No | No |
Colors | Black | Black |
Battery Time | - | 150 h |
Battery Type | - | Lithium polymer |

Price and Warranty
Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.
Warranty | 2 Years | 1 or 2 years |
Amazon Price (#Ad) |
Vs Comparison Analysis
Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.
Model | Ironclaw RGB | Naga V2 Pro |
Picture | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Age | 5 Years | 2 Years |
Relative Age | 3 Years Older | 3 Years Younger |
User Rating ☆ | 21% Better Score | 21% Worse Score |
Dimensions | ~10.50 mm (or ~0.41 in) Longer ~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Wider ~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Higher |
~10.50 mm (or ~0.41 in) Shorter ~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Narrower ~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Lower |
Weight | ~29.00 g or ~0.06 lbs Lighter | ~29.00 g or ~0.06 lbs Heavier |
Sensor Type & Model | Same Tech Different Model |
Same Tech Different Model |
Resolution Range [DPImax - DPImin] |
Smaller Range | Larger Range |
Max Resolution | 40% Worse Max Res. 12000 Less DPI/CPI |
40% Better Max Res. 12000 More DPI/CPI |
Min Resolution | Same Min Res. | Same Min Res. |
Maximum Acceleration | 29% Worse Max G | 29% Better Max G |
Maximum Tracking Speed | 67% Worse Max IPS | 67% Better Max IPS |
Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate | Same Polling Rate |
Lift Off Distance | Greater Lift Off Distance | Smaller Lift Off Distance |
Switch Type | Different Switch Tech | Different Switch Tech |
Switch Lifespan | 44% Worse Lifespan | 44% Better Lifespan |
Feet Material Type | Worse Feet Material | Better Feet Material |
Number of Buttons | 13 Less Buttons | 13 More Buttons |
Battery Time | ||
Click Latency | 55% Worse Click Latency | 55% Better Click Latency |
Shift Latency |
Graphical Vs Comparison
Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!
Physical Characteristics (mm, grams) |
|
Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
|
Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better) |
Graphs Description | The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing). |
Compare Price #Ad |
Corsair Ironclaw RGB | Razer Naga V2 Pro |

Final Vs Words
Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.
This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Corsair Ironclaw RGB and Razer Naga V2 Pro, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.
First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The Ironclaw RGB is older, 5 years old, being released in the 2019, while the other one is younger, 2 years old, being released in the 2022. The production age difference is 3 year(s). This makes the Naga V2 Pro kind of more attractive in terms of freshness.
• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳
When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Naga V2 Pro mouse, Ironclaw RGB is ~10.50 mm (or ~0.41 in) Longer, ~4.50 mm (or ~0.18 in) Wider and ~1.50 mm (or ~0.06 in) Higher, which makes it, overally, 16.5 mm (or 0.65 in) moderately bigger and better suiting greater hands.
Considering the weight, Corsair Ironclaw RGB is 22% lighter, a difference of 29.00 g (0.06 lbs), which can be considered quite significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Regarding the Ergonomy, both mice are meant to be used with your right hand. They offer different grip, Palm grip by Ironclaw RGB while Naga V2 Pro has Palm grip, Claw grip; this last one can be considered more adaptable, with a number of grip possibilities equal to 2 instead of the 1 offered by the other one.
• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️
Let's now compare Corsair Ironclaw RGB sensor with the one of Razer Naga V2 Pro. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3391 equipped by Ironclaw RGB and Focus Pro 30K used by Naga V2 Pro. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.
Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the Ironclaw RGB provides 17900 DPI/CPI, while Naga V2 Pro offers 29900 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, Naga V2 Pro is offering 40% better Max Resolution, 12000 More DPI/CPI.As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, Naga V2 Pro shows a better value, 70 G, a moderate difference of 20 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Naga V2 Pro shows a preferable value, 750 IPS, a great difference of 500 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.
They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of Ironclaw RGB shows an higher value, 2.5 mm, a great difference of 1.30 mm. Anyway, Ironclaw RGB offers adjustable lift off distance through software.
Click and Shift Latencies
Corsair Ironclaw RGB has higher click latency than Razer Naga V2 Pro, a consistent difference of 4.20 ms, 55% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Ironclaw RGB is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, Naga V2 Pro has a shift latency of 11.61 ms which can be considered quite decent, compared to a medium quality mouse.
• Other Features 📎
Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, Ironclaw RGB has Omron while Naga V2 Pro has Optical Gen-3; moreover, the lifespan of first mouse is 50 millions clicks while the second is 900 millions clicks, 44% worse Lifespan, a difference of 40 millions clicks that can be evaluated very significant. The Feet Material is better for Naga V2 Pro, being this Virgin Grade PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 7 offered by first mouse and 20 offered by the second one, a great difference of 13 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Corsair Ironclaw RGB are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Razer Naga V2 Pro is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, Adjustable Scroll-Wheel Resistance.

Final Choice & Ranking
Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Ironclaw RGB and Naga V2 Pro models, for buying decision.
In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.
Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Ironclaw RGB and Naga V2 Pro performance in different utilization environments.
Corsair Ironclaw RGB | Razer Naga V2 Pro |
19013 | 28987 |
40% | 60% |
Check Price | Check Price |
Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).
Your Rate | Max Res | Max Acc | Max Track | Poll Rate | |
Click Lag | Adj. Weight | N. Buttons | DPI Ind. | ||
You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.
Help me with a Question!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.
Author
To let you know who has written this Corsair Ironclaw RGB Vs Razer Naga V2 Pro comparison and how it was created.
Disclaimers
Small print and stuff
Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.
MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.
We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!