Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Logitech G203 Prodigy vs Xtrfy M4 Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Logitech Xtrfy
Model G203 Prodigy M4
Photo
Release Date 2017 2019
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~116.6 mm
~11.66 cm
~4.59 in
~120 mm
~12 cm
~4.72 in
Width ~62.15 mm
~6.22 cm
~2.45 in
~68 mm
~6.8 cm
~2.68 in
Height ~38.2 mm
~3.82 cm
~1.5 in
~39 mm
~3.9 cm
~1.54 in
Weight ~85 g
~0.09 kg
~0.19 lbs
~69 g
~0.07 kg
~0.15 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model Mercury PMW3389
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 200 - 8000 400 - 16000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 8000 16000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 200 400
Maximum Acceleration 25 G 50 G
Max Tracking Speed 200 IPS 400 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 1000 Hz (1ms)
Lift Off Distance ~1.0 mm Not Adjustable 0.8 mm
Switch Type Unknown Omron
Switch Lifespan - 20 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE (250 kilometers) PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes No
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 5 ms 7.0 ms
Shift Latency - -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Right-handed
Buttons 6 6
Suggested Grip Fingertip grip, Claw grip Palm grip, Claw grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black, White, Pink, Blue, Retro
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 1 Year
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model G203 Prodigy M4
Picture
Age 7 Years 5 Years
Relative Age 2 Years Older 2 Years Younger
User Rating 7% Worse Score 7% Better Score
Dimensions ~3.40 mm (or ~0.13 in) Shorter
~5.85 mm (or ~0.23 in) Narrower
~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Lower
~3.40 mm (or ~0.13 in) Longer
~5.85 mm (or ~0.23 in) Wider
~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Higher
Weight ~16.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Heavier ~16.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Lighter
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Way Smaller Range Way Larger Range
Max Resolution 50% Worse Max Res.
8000 Less DPI/CPI
50% Better Max Res.
8000 More DPI/CPI
Min Resolution 50% Better Min Res.
200 More DPI/CPI
50% Worse Min Res.
200 Less DPI/CPI
Maximum Acceleration 50% Worse Max G 50% Better Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 50% Worse Max IPS 50% Better Max IPS
Polling Rate Same Polling Rate Same Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Greater Lift Off Distance Smaller Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Different Switch Tech Different Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan
Feet Material Type Different Feet Material Different Feet Material
Number of Buttons Same Buttons Number Same Buttons Number
Battery Time
Click Latency 29% Better Click Latency 29% Worse Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Logitech G203 Prodigy Xtrfy M4
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Logitech G203 Prodigy and Xtrfy M4, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The G203 Prodigy is older, 7 years old, being released in the 2017, while the other one is younger, 5 years old, being released in the 2019. The production age difference is 2 year(s). This makes the M4 a bit more attractive in terms of freshness.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to M4 mouse, G203 Prodigy is ~3.40 mm (or ~0.13 in) Shorter, ~5.85 mm (or ~0.23 in) Narrower and ~0.80 mm (or ~0.03 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 10.05 mm (or -0.40 in) moderately smaller and better suiting tinier hands.

Considering the weight, Logitech G203 Prodigy is 19% heavier, a difference of 16.00 g (0.04 lbs), which can be considered moderately significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, G203 Prodigy is meant to be Ambidextrous while M4 is Right-handed. They offer different grip, Fingertip grip, Claw grip by G203 Prodigy while M4 has Palm grip, Claw grip; however, the degree of adaptability is the same and equal to 2.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Logitech G203 Prodigy sensor with the one of Xtrfy M4. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: Mercury equipped by G203 Prodigy and PMW3389 used by M4. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off
The mice offer different resolution range (DPImax - DPImin), the G203 Prodigy provides 7800 DPI/CPI, while M4 offers 15600 DPI/CPI, meaning that the last one has larger range. Consider picking up the one having the sensitivity range that mostly suits your needs, depending on the aim (Gaming/Business) but also the kind of game you are going to use it mostly (e.g. FPS is different than RTS or MOBA). If you need a higher precision mouse, meaning that for the same length of shift the mouse will recognize more movement, "reading" more dots per inch and, in other words, will move faster on the screen, M4 is offering 50% better Max Resolution, 8000 More DPI/CPI.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, M4 shows a better value, 50 G, a significant difference of 25 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, M4 shows a preferable value, 400 IPS, a significant difference of 200 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of G203 Prodigy shows an higher value, 1 mm, a small difference of 0.20 mm. Anyway, M4 offers adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

Logitech G203 Prodigy has lower click latency than Xtrfy M4, a not so small difference of 2.00 ms, 29% better Click Latency, which can be evaluated slightly significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare G203 Prodigy and M4 shift latency. Contact us to request priority data update.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with different Switch Technology, G203 Prodigy has Unknown while M4 has Omron; The Feet Material is different, G203 Prodigy (PTFE (250 kilometers)) and M4 (PTFE). Considering the available Number of Buttons, 6 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a no difference of 0 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Logitech G203 Prodigy are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Xtrfy M4 is giving DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check Our B.A.T. 6+ Review
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the G203 Prodigy and M4 models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the G203 Prodigy and M4 performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Logitech G203 Prodigy Xtrfy M4
2138926611
45%55%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Logitech G203 Prodigy and Xtrfy M4 specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Logitech G203 Prodigy Vs Xtrfy M4 comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!