Mad Catz Sponsor Background search expand

Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition vs Corsair Glaive RGB Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer Razer Corsair
Model Lancehead Tournament Edition Glaive RGB
Photo
Release Date 2017 2017
Your Rating
Price
(#Ad)
First Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length ~124 mm
~12.4 cm
~4.88 in
~126 mm
~12.6 cm
~4.96 in
Width ~70 mm
~7 cm
~2.76 in
~70 mm
~7 cm
~2.76 in
Height ~37 mm
~3.7 cm
~1.46 in
~44.5 mm
~4.45 cm
~1.75 in
Weight ~103 g
~0.1 kg
~0.23 lbs
~121 g
~0.12 kg
~0.27 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type Optical Optical
Sensor Model PMW3389 PMW3367
Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 - 16000 100 - 16000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI) 16000 16000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI) 100 100
Maximum Acceleration 50 G 50 G
Max Tracking Speed 450 IPS 300 IPS
Polling Rate 1000 Hz (1ms) 1000 Hz (1ms)
Lift Off Distance Adjustable (~1.2 mm with HQ cloths) High >3.0 mm
Switch Type Omron Omron
Switch Lifespan 50 million clicks 50 million clicks
Feet (Material) PTFE PTFE
Onboard Memory Yes Yes
Smoothing / Filtering No No
Hardware Acceleration No No
Click Latency 12.9 ms 9.4 ms
Shift Latency -

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type Gaming mouse Gaming mouse
Sensor Type Optical Optical
Ergonomy Ambidextrous Right-handed
Buttons 8 6
Suggested Grip Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip Palm grip
DPI Indicator Yes Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Lighting Yes Yes
Adjustable Weight No No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance No No
Silent Clicking No No
Colors Black Black
Battery Time - -
Battery Type - -
Second Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
Amazon Price
(#Ad)

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model Lancehead Tournament Edition Glaive RGB
Picture
Age 7 Years 7 Years
Relative Age Same Age Same Age
User Rating 18% Better Score 18% Worse Score
Dimensions ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Shorter
~Same Width
~7.50 mm (or ~0.30 in) Lower
~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Longer
~Same Width
~7.50 mm (or ~0.30 in) Higher
Weight ~18.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Lighter ~18.00 g or ~0.04 lbs Heavier
Sensor Type & Model Same Tech
Different Model
Same Tech
Different Model
Resolution Range
[DPImax - DPImin]
Same Range Same Range
Max Resolution Same Max Res. Same Max Res.
Min Resolution Same Min Res. Same Min Res.
Maximum Acceleration Same Max G Same Max G
Maximum Tracking Speed 33% Better Max IPS 33% Worse Max IPS
Polling Rate Same Polling Rate Same Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance Smaller Lift Off Distance Greater Lift Off Distance
Switch Type Same Switch Tech Same Switch Tech
Switch Lifespan Same Lifespan Same Lifespan
Feet Material Type Same Feet Material Same Feet Material
Number of Buttons 2 More Buttons 2 Less Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency 27% Worse Click Latency 27% Better Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics
(mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Other Features
(0 ➡ 100%)
(worse ➡ better)
Graphs Description The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).
Compare Price
#Ad
Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition Corsair Glaive RGB
Third Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

This final paragraph will help you in the decision making process, between Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition and Corsair Glaive RGB, and in selecting the mouse that is performing better and best suits your needs. We are aware that every user has own needs and preferences, due to this each mouse could be better for some features and worse for other ones. The purpose of the text is to highlight this possibility and generate an "overall score" for a purchase decision.

First of all, both mice share the same utilization aim, Gaming mouse. The mice are aged similarly, 7 years old, being released in the 2017.

• Dimensions, Weight, Ergonomy 📐⚖️🫳

When it comes to evaluate mice dimensions, you should take into consideration the size of your hand and check if it would properly fit it or not. In this case, you should check which mice would be the fittest. Compared to Glaive RGB mouse, Lancehead Tournament Edition is ~2.00 mm (or ~0.08 in) Shorter, ~Same Width and ~7.50 mm (or ~0.30 in) Lower, which makes it, overally, 9.5 mm (or -0.37 in) slightly smaller and better suiting tinier hands.

Considering the weight, Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition is 15% lighter, a difference of 18.00 g (0.04 lbs), which can be considered moderately significant. We do not express a particular preference for heavier or lighter mice, being this a completely personal objective preference. Anyway, both mice does not offer weight personalization .

Regarding the Ergonomy, Lancehead Tournament Edition is meant to be Ambidextrous while Glaive RGB is Right-handed. They offer different grip, Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip by Lancehead Tournament Edition while Glaive RGB has Palm grip; the first one can be considered more adaptable, with a greater number of grip possibilities equal to 3 instead of the 1 offered by the other one.

• Sensor and Latencies 🐭⏱️

Let's now compare Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition sensor with the one of Corsair Glaive RGB. The two mice share the same sensor technology, that is Optical, but different sensor model: PMW3389 equipped by Lancehead Tournament Edition and PMW3367 used by Glaive RGB. It is very important to say that, although tech and model sometimes coincide, the assembly and composition of interior circuits might result in different specs and latencies.

Resolution, Max Acceleration and Max Tracking, Polling Rate and Lift Off

The mice offer the same resolution range (DPImax - DPImin) of 15900 DPI/CPI in which you can pick up the sensitivity that mostly suits your needs. They are offering the same Max Resolution, 16000 DPI/CPI, meaning that for the same length of shift the mice will recognize the same amount of movement, "reading" equal dots per inch and, in other words, they will move with the same speed on the screen.

As for the Maximum Acceleration, which measures the maximum pull force in G(s) that the sensor can trace before inconsistencies occur, the models show equal values, 50 G. Going on, taking into account the Maximum Tracking Speed, the velocity (inches per second) that the mouse can move at before it starts to loose track and cause anomalies, Lancehead Tournament Edition shows a preferable value, 450 IPS, a significant difference of 150 IPS. Take into account that max G and max IPS mostly affect activities requiring very fast mouse shift, together with the shift latency that we will analyse further in this section.

They have a Polling Rate of 1000 Hz, in other words they report data to computer 1 time every 1.00 ms. Lastly, the Lift Off distance of Glaive RGB shows an higher value, 3 mm, a great difference of 1.80 mm. Anyway, Lancehead Tournament Edition offers adjustable lift off distance through software.

Click and Shift Latencies

Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition has higher click latency than Corsair Glaive RGB, a consistent difference of 3.50 ms, 27% worse Click Latency, which can be evaluated significant, in terms of compared performance. Anyway, we feel it is important to underline that the differences in latencies are often more perceptible from the machine's point of view rather than human's, reducing the real impact of these values and deviations. At the moment there is no available data to compare the mice shift latency, since the data of Lancehead Tournament Edition is missing. Contact us to request priority data update. However, Glaive RGB has a shift latency of NaN ms which can be considered not so good, compared to a medium quality mouse.

• Other Features 📎

Let's now have a look, finally, to the general features of the two mice. They are equipped with the same Switch Technology, Omron; moreover, they have the same life span of 50 millions clicks. The Feet Material is the same, PTFE. Considering the available Number of Buttons, 8 offered by first mouse and 6 offered by the second one, a small difference of 2 that can be considered important or not depending on the utilization purpose. In the end, the features offered by Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition are On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB, while Corsair Glaive RGB is giving On board Memory, DPI Indicator, RGB Lighting, Customizable RGB.

Fourth Banner of Mad Catz Sponsored Mouse Product
Check M.O.J.O. M1 Specs
#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Lancehead Tournament Edition and Glaive RGB models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Lancehead Tournament Edition and Glaive RGB performance in different utilization environments.


Comparison Score

Mouse Specs comparison score has been computed equally weighting the "OVERVIEW" comparison variables of the above Graph, with a medium value of 3 out of 5.

Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition Corsair Glaive RGB
2485323147
52%48%
Check Price Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your RateMax ResMax AccMax TrackPoll Rate
Click LagAdj. WeightN. ButtonsDPI Ind.


The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition and Corsair Glaive RGB specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.


I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!




Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition Vs Corsair Glaive RGB comparison and how it was created.
Author V4SS1L1's Avatar

Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
Check the About Us page for a complete background view.


Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!