Ozone Neon M10 vs Asus TUF Gaming M3 Comparison

Comparison and Difference Between

Use dropdown menus to compare different models.

Compare Mice

Mouse Details

Subjects of comparisons - brand and model.

Manufacturer	Ozone	Asus
Model	Neon M10	TUF Gaming M3
Photo
Release Date	2016	2019
Your Rating	3.6 / 5 ( 5 votes )	3.9 / 5 ( 57 votes )
Price (#Ad)	Check Price	Check Price

#AD

Dimensions and Weight

Mice size, weight and cable length (if applicable).

Length	~125 mm ~12.5 cm ~4.92 in	~118.2 mm ~11.82 cm ~4.65 in
Width	~65 mm ~6.5 cm ~2.56 in	~68 mm ~6.8 cm ~2.68 in
Height	~36.8 mm ~3.68 cm ~1.45 in	~40 mm ~4 cm ~1.57 in
Weight	~90 g ~0.09 kg ~0.2 lbs	~84 g ~0.08 kg ~0.19 lbs

Technical Specs

Full tech specifications of the given mice.

Sensor Type	Optical	Optical
Sensor Model	Avago A3050	PMW3325
Resolution (CPI/DPI)	800 - 2000	200 - 7000
Max Resolution (CPI/DPI)	2000	7000
Min Resolution (CPI/DPI)	800	200
Maximum Acceleration	20 G	20 G
Max Tracking Speed	60 IPS	100 IPS
Polling Rate	1000 Hz (1ms)	1000 Hz (1ms)
Lift Off Distance	~2.0 mm	2.0 mm
Switch Type	Omron	Omron
Switch Lifespan	-	20 million clicks
Feet (Material)	Plastic	PTFE
Onboard Memory	No	No
Smoothing / Filtering	Yes	No
Hardware Acceleration	Yes	No
Click Latency	-	15.7 ms
Shift Latency	-	-

Accessories and Features

Other options such as grip style, lighting and connectivity.

Mouse Type	Gaming mouse	Gaming mouse
Sensor Type	Optical	Optical
Ergonomy	Ambidextrous	Right-handed
Buttons	6	7
Suggested Grip	Claw grip, Fingertip grip	Palm grip, Claw grip, Fingertip grip
DPI Indicator	Yes	Yes
Lighting	Yes (Red only)	Yes
Adjustable Lighting	No	Yes
Adjustable Weight	No	No
Editable Scroll-Wheel Resistance	No	No
Silent Clicking	No	No
Colors	Black, Red	Black
Battery Time	-	-
Battery Type	-	-

#AD

Price and Warranty

Satisfaction is (not) guaranteed.

Warranty	2 Years	2 Years
Amazon Price (#Ad)	Check Price	Check Price

Vs Comparison Analysis

Our coding Monkeys 🐵 elaborated a Vs comparison for you.

Model	Neon M10	TUF Gaming M3
Picture
Age
Relative Age
User Rating ☆
Dimensions
Weight
Sensor Type & Model
Resolution Range [DPI_max - DPI_min]
Max Resolution
Min Resolution
Maximum Acceleration
Maximum Tracking Speed
Polling Rate
Lift Off Distance
Switch Type
Switch Lifespan
Feet Material Type
Number of Buttons
Battery Time
Click Latency
Shift Latency

Graphical Vs Comparison

Wow! The Monkeys 🐒 learnt to make Graphs!

Physical Characteristics (mm, grams)
Sensor Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better)
Latency Characteristics (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better)
Other Features (0 ➡ 100%) (worse ➡ better)

Graphs Description

The Physical Characteristics comparison is just a viewable representation of the devices' length, width, height and weight. Sensor, Latency and Other Features are, instead, computed within the range 0-->100, taking into account if the variable is getting better with the increase of its value (e.g the highest max DPI, the better it is) or vice versa (the lowest Click Latency, the better); for example, a score of 50 for both devices means they are equal, scores of 70 and 30 mean that first one better. So, the data are homogeneous to provide immediate meaning, higher bar(s) means better value(s). An empty graph means that there is not enough data to compute that comparison (one value or both are missing).

Compare Price
#Ad

Ozone Neon M10

Asus TUF Gaming M3

#AD

Final Vs Words

Aiding our visitors to the final choice between the mice.

#AD

Final Choice & Ranking

Numerical and Graphical Scoring of the Neon M10 and TUF Gaming M3 models, for buying decision.

In this final section you will find Mouse Specs comparison score of the two mice. The graphs below are elaborated considering the most important variables per each type of device utilization.

Click the buttons to have a wide view of the Neon M10 and TUF Gaming M3 performance in different utilization environments.




Check Price	Check Price

Use the selectors below to weight the score depending on your needs, from 0 (not important) to 5 (high priority).

Your Rate	Max Res	Max Acc	Max Track	Poll Rate

Click Lag	Adj. Weight	N. Buttons	DPI Ind.

The scores above represent a numerical evaluation of the Ozone Neon M10 and Asus TUF Gaming M3 specifications.

You should take into consideration also the personal feelings and not only the technical specs.

I'm not sure...
Help me with a Question!

Thank you for reading this comparison!
Please send us a feedback or any improvement idea.

Author

To let you know who has written this Ozone Neon M10 Vs Asus TUF Gaming M3 comparison and how it was created.

V4SS1L1

➤ Born in 1990, Italian, Passionate Laptop Gamer, Management Engineer, JavaScript Coder and Web Designer.
➤ Numerous mice owned in his life, he understands users' needs from Gaming and Business point of view, being one of them.
➤ Has observed the evolution and technical improvements of the Mouse device in this 30+ years.
➤ JS Coded a value dependent comparison model of 280+ Mice and 40K+ Comparison Pages, to guide visitors in buying choices.
➤ Check the About Us page for a complete background view.

Disclaimers

Small print and stuff

Disclaimer: The data and mouse specs on our website are provided on "as is, as available basis" without warranty of any kind, although the effort in data validation to offer high quality service. MouseSpecs.org is not responsible for any possible damages caused by errors on our site. Double check all the information directly on the manufacturer sites.

MouseSpecs.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and/or country specific amazon websites.

We do not endorse any product or service for money unless clearly specified. We do not use any artificial intelligence to produce our content, the coding monkeys have elaborated a case/value sensitive java script, with an high degree of specificity. Check the About Us page!